On the eve of
Westminster, show excitement is building in
the dog community, on both social media and
television,
with the participation of three newly AKC
recognized breeds, one of which is the
Sloughi.
As a Sloughi owner and potential breeder, I
am concerned for the breed's future, because
with fame and popularity, there is always a
cost.
The first concern I wish to voice is that of
genetic integrity.
According to scientific
studies , many hounds in Africa and
the Middle East
have been separated by geography,
leading to their evolution as pure breeds,
even though they have similar functions.
True
Salukis are found primarily in the Middle
East, in the Arabian Peninsula, Iran and
related environs. True Sloughis
originate in North Africa,
in the Mahgreb area, including the countries
of Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco(which is
listed as the Country of Origin according to
the FCI),
and sometimes in Libya. It is not my intent
to write the history of the breed, as Dr.
Dominique Crapon deCaprona,
has thoroughly and efficiently
explained it in her books, 'Sloughi',
published by Kennel Club Books (2004) and in
'The Sloughi: 1852-1952' (2007), the only
books currently
published on the breed. She has also
been cited in Best in Show Daily (2016) and
authored recent articles found in Sighthound
Review (2017)
about the history and evolution of the
breed.
As Sloughis will undoubtedly become more
popular with AKC recognition, it is
imperative of those who choose to breed
their dogs
to continue to breed only genuine
Sloughis, not Saluki-Sloughi crosses. All
this will do is create a 'new' breed such as
the Labradoodle types
so expensive and popular today, and
lose the subtle nuances, characteristics and
traits of the breed. It won't take
long for the Sloughi
to become a 'generic' hound. Also, be
aware this is not an American only problem.
There are many breeders in Europe who breed
and sell
Saluki-Sloughi mixes, so please don't
think I am throwing stones at Americans
only.
I feel it is an opportunity for the American
Sloughi fancy to truly improve the breed,
and negate mistakes that have occurred
elsewhere,
instead of perpetuating poor breed quality
and type.
I do realize this is a
controversial statement, but it is the
truth. The 'average' person/puppy buyer will
not know this, which is why breeders
are SO important, especially when laying the
foundation of the breed here in the States.
Breeders will be making the breeding
choices,
not the puppy buyers. With so few dogs
in the country, every breeding
made is crucial to the breed as a whole.
Sloughis are also a very fortunate
breed, compared to many others, as
dogs are still bred in their native
countries, from which we can refresh the genepool with
dogs
that still can and do perform their purpose,
which in the majority of breeds is
completely unavailable.
The next claim I expect to arise is that
Sloughis are quite rare, and it is too
expensive to import dogs from reputable
breeders abroad,
so why not? Again, this points back to
American breeders. They must be willing to
import dogs which are true Sloughis, and
breed only
these dogs, should they be of sufficient
qualify. We need to protect the breed and
grow it slowly here, so that we do not incur
genetic disease,
impure lines and generally poor specimens,
as famed AKC judge Anne Rogers Clark used to
call, "the drag of the breed'.
And lastly, how can you tell if your dog is
a cross? Look on the pawpeds Sloughi
database and look far back into a dog's
pedigree.
Look for the following names: Laba'an Il al
Khalij (registered as a Sloughi, while his
feathered littermate was registered as a
Saluki(!),
Jenna (a smooth Saluki), and L'Karla
Diane(Smooth Afghan--yes, they exist!).
Laba'an was listed as a sire for three
breeds: Salukis, Sloughis
and Azawahks, making his contributions much
more far ranging and concerning, as he
impacts three different breeds.
What is more important than just the names
listed above is the percentage in
which these three dogs are found in a
pedigree
(on Pawpeds click on "Foundation" to find
the percentages of contribution of each dog
in the pedigree). They are still found
in
varying amounts today, as they appear
in some European dogs as well. Closely
bred dogs of quality, although somewhat
objectionable,
are not nearly as detrimental to breed type
as mixes.
Again, it is not my intent to castigate or
shame ANY breeders, but I think that
here in the US, we have an amazing and rare
opportunity
to improve what has in the past, been an
unfortunate situation. We must all be honest
with ourselves, look at pedigrees and not
blame.
Our job as breeders and owners is to move
the breed as a whole to improve the
breed.
It is my sincere hope that the newly
evolving Sloughi dog show world works to be
inclusive, honest and motivated to produce
the best genuine Sloughis in the
world...hopefully in 10 to 20 years, other
countries around the globe will be
interested in importing
our dogs to improve their stock versus the
opposite!
Nancy
Lovelady is a California resident, with over
35 years of breeding, showing and handling
experience,
and has participated in AKC, FCI and IABKC
shows. A second generation Cairn Terrier
breeder under the McHan kennel name,
she bred, and handled dogs for her kennel
and others, while working full time and
raising a family. She became enamoured of
hounds in the 90s,
but due to an experience with one of
her dogs bloating, she searched to find a
healthy, feisty sighthound breed, and has
fallen in love with the Sloughi.
She is currently an AKC approved judge
in terriers and some hound breeds (including
Sloughis) and has judged IABKC shows.
These pages, the
text and images within them, are copyrighted by SFAA
1995-2011.
They may not be reproduced without written permission
from the Sloughi Fanciers Association of America.